Keräsimme $2.3M pre-seed kierroksella muuttaaksemme hammashoitohallintoa. Lue lisää
Arviomme tulevan EU:n tekoälyasetuksen mukaisesti
Version 1.0 – May 25, 2025
Dentio is a cloud service that:
Both components draw conclusions from input data to achieve pre-defined objectives, so Dentio falls within the broad definition of an AI system in Article 3(1) of the Act.
Dentio operates with limited autonomy: it never executes actions beyond producing a draft for human verification, and output is never self-deployed into the electronic health record (EHR) without explicit user approval.
Additionally, Dentio processes special-category health data (Article 9 GDPR). A heightened precautionary approach therefore applies: all training/evaluation data are fully pseudonymised; role-based access controls limit engineers who can view raw transcripts; and every access event is logged.
Given the legislator's broad wording and the absence of final guidance, Dentio assumes the service may be regarded as an AI system and proactively applies the relevant obligations.
Because Dentio records natural-language conversations between dental professionals and patients, individuals interact - albeit indirectly - with an AI system. Article 50 therefore requires notifying them that AI is involved. Dentio:
Annex II (harmonised legislation). Dentio is not a medical device under Regulation 2017/745, because it serves purely administrative purposes and offers no diagnostic or therapeutic recommendation.
Annex III (listed high-risk use cases). Dentio does not evaluate patient eligibility, triage or resource allocation; drafts remain under clinical control.
Article 6(2) fallback test. A system failure cannot reasonably significantly harm a person, because every draft is reviewed and, if necessary, amended by the dentist before entering the official record.
Conclusion: Dentio does not qualify as a high-risk AI system. Section 2.2 of Dentio's Terms of Service classifies it as a limited-risk AI system.
Dentio is a limited-risk AI system: it must meet the horizontal transparency duties in Chapter V, but is exempt from conformity assessment, CE-marking and quality-management-system obligations reserved for high-risk AI.
| Requirement | Relevant AI-Act Article | How Dentio Meets the Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Inform natural persons they interact with AI | Art. 50(1) | Posters, verbal script and checkbox confirmation before recording |
| Provide information enabling users to understand system function | Art. 50(2) | Public FAQ and technical white paper describing scope, limits and human-in-the-loop workflow |
| Keep outputs predictable, transparent and under human oversight | Recital 47; draft Art. 52 | Drafts never auto-populate the EHR; clinician must approve; LLM temperature near 0 to minimise hallucinations |
| Maintain logs for post-market monitoring | Art. 61 | 24-month immutable audit logs of every access and export event (DPA § 5.7) |
| Provide a mechanism for users to report serious incidents | Art. 62 | In-app "Report issue" button connects to 24 × 7 incident desk; Dentio escalates per incident-response plan (DPA § 6) |
Dentio's security and compliance steering group reviews this assessment at least annually or when:
Updates are communicated to all customers whenever their obligations change.
Dentio AB – Legal & Compliance
Huddinge Stationsväg 5, 141 35 Huddinge, Sweden
E-mail: info@dentio.io
This analysis is based on the draft political agreement of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act as of May 25, 2025. The legal environment remains fluid; Dentio will reassess and update this document once the final text, delegated acts or Commission guidance are available.